Most Popular

"Most Popular" tools sponsored by:

National Features >

  • Broward-Palm Beach New Times

    Sexual Healing

    For Florida's sole remaining sex surrogate, love is a many splintered thing.

    By Michael J. Mooney

  • City Pages

    Your Friendly Neighborhood War Profiteer

    It's not just giant companies cashing in on America's defense industry.

    By Jeff Severns Guntzel

  • The Pitch

    Supersizing Sonic

    How a throwaway idea at the Barkley ad agency became the "Sonic Guys."

    By Justin Kendall

  • Houston Press

    Temples of Tex-Mex

    A diner's guide to Texas's oldest Mexican restaurants.

    By Robb Walsh

Hold Your Fire

Readers sound off on policing of the internet, the Catholic church and Wash. U.

Published on December 05, 2007

Feature, November 29, 2007

Vigilante Warning
A point well made: I enjoyed reading Keegan Hamilton's story, "Broken Lives on Waterford Crystal Drive," but his penultimate paragraph seems dangerously oversimplified. He wrote: "If some harm were to befall a member of the Drew family or their property as the result of their personal information being posted in an anonymous comment on a blog, it would be nearly impossible to find someone to hold legally responsible."While it is true that Web sites and ISPs have immunity under the Communications Decency Act for third-party content, it does not necessarily follow that it would be "nearly impossible" or even difficult to identify a legally responsible party. If someone attacks a member of the Drew family, that attacker is plainly responsible for the attack, even if he was inspired by blog postings. In other words, all the normal laws governing real-world attacks still apply. Because it overstates the effect of CDA protections for Web sites and ISPs, real-world vigilantes might think they are less traceable or culpable for targeting the Drews for harm.
Joseph J. Wang, Sunnyville, California

News Real, November 22, 2007

Cop Out
Get a clue, Wash. U.: Washington University Police Chief Don Strom's statement that "his antennae on alcohol use are up," in Kathleen McLaughlin's story "Taser Show," is an outright laughable lie. The university's police are a joke when it comes to this matter. I live on the south side of Forsyth Boulevard between Big Bend and one of the frat houses down the street. On numerous occasions we get the displeasure of watching and hearing countless, obviously underage students walking to and from one of their parties.

This spring, during one of the frat house parties where people were just standing around in my yard and throwing their cups in it, I decided to call the police. A few minutes later I saw some University City police rolling down the street and then eventually pulling off to the side of the road near my house. Not even one minute went by after that when a Washington University police car pulled right in front of where the U. City police had parked. The Wash. U. police officer got out and proceeded to act like he was in charge of the scene, even though he was completely out of his jurisdiction. It was obvious that the university police had their scanners tuned in to University City's radio frequency. This way they can rush to the help of their precious little rich kids so that they won't get in any trouble. It seems to me that Washington University's police department motto should be "Protect our rich kids and screw the public."
Eric Hernlund, University City

News Real, November 8, 2007



Riverfront Times Insiders

  • Local food, music and news blasts
  • Free Stuff
Backpage.com